The Public Ought To Know...something
Tuesday morning, I posted to Gotham politics a blurb and link from Crains that “Theater cancels premiere of controversial film” with a comments aimed a Gotham bloggers that I see a great blog here. Anyone familiar with that Gotham mantra, you say it you own it?
Sort of happened here......
One blogger suggested an interest in taking up the mantle but expressed concern at least five others might seize the opportunity to comment before it cycles back to her day. I suggested she poll them; she also volunteered she already has two columns ready to rock. I responded: When I wrote my regular column I often penned commentaries several weeks ahead, even sometimes submitting them in advance to my editors.
HOWEVER, when I felt the muse I drafted alternative commentaries based on current events or new information that cried for me to weigh in. That may not show per se in my ebook, The Public Ought To Know, but I recall doing it and the cool thing when I often wrote those pieces: the substance flowed the way a songwriter divined his/her work (or at least they so claimed).
A shadowy group whose name suggests the opposite and thus gets no mention here moved beyond the corporate espionage that released embarrassing emails (another blog here folks: did any news outlet actually have authorization to print the content?) to threatened violence at the NewYork City premiere and screenings of “The Interview” (it already premiered last week in Los Angeles). Sony reacted by allowing theater chains to cancel showings. Stars Seth Rogen and James Franco backed out of media appearances including a Rogen guest spot on Late Night With Seth Meyers. Representatives for both stars offered no comments to press inquiries.
Sony even canceled the film's slated Xmas day release. Of course Sony only acted AFTER AMC Theaters, Regal Entertainment, Cinemark and Carmike Cinemas – controlling 19,200 screens – and some smaller U.S. chains and Canada's Cineplex Entertainment all canceled bookings. You might say Sony sought to get ahead of the story since its movie was going down. An interesting factoid just might be what kind of insurance Sony has that just might cover its financial losses.
And it appears the movie operators basically reacted to pressure the mall operators concerned that fear about safety at the Multiplexes there could effectively end the holiday shopping season.
Then we learn that American intelligence officials concluded that the North Korean government was centrally involved with the attacks on Sony's computers.
The film cost $45 million and promotion another $35 million.
The entire episode raises two questions. First ought we to succumb to fear and shut down in the face of threats to inflict another 9/11 as many celebrate Xmas and others take the day to gather with friends, take in a movie and eat Chinese food. Or should we stand tall. Threats real or imagined and a clear inability to guarantee safety led to the shutdowns. On the other hand, we continue to work and play and follow out daily routines; when does a threat mean we stand down?
The other question involves judgment and taste, and perhaps the lack thereof. Others in Hollywood question – at least now – the Sony decision to make the film. They note the incendiary topic of killing off a real live world leader and the lack of taste of the filmmakers' previous movies. Of course none of these industry talking heads raised an objection during the development and making of the incendiary film.
So maybe the real story involves not the invasion of data. I look forward to Raj Goel's comments and insights here. Maybe the breach occurred because Sony just failed to invest the resources necessary to protect itself and its employees.
Perhaps the real story is the dumbing down of Hollywood fare. For the longest time, Cable has offered most of the arty and quality entertainment. Maybe Hollywood needs some introspection here.
At the same down, it still bothers me how everyone stood down and played scared. Perhaps no other choice existed. Perhaps the film's producers including its star, Mr. Rogen, acted irresponsibly. Ditto Sony.
At the end of the day, Sony and the film garnered mucho p.r. But questions remain if this film will see the light of day. Maybe no DVD or netflix release either.
Weigh in. The Public Ought To Know.
And thank you Ben Geizhals for ceding the space to me.

Comments
NULL
NULL
NULL
There are many angles to this story but I wonder whether this episode will go down in history as a pivotal point cyber warfare.
NULL
As you correctly acknowledge Corey, there are so many different angles to this story. The thoughts of hacking, cyber-terrorism and terrorism anger and scare me tremendously. On the other hand- while I sense that the US would not react with terrorism had a movie been produced overseas about the killing of our president-I wonder what our reaction would have been.
NULL
The SONY breach was something SONY earned after years of NEGLECT and failing to learn lessons from the past.
Sony caused a huge global problem with the rootkit on the Beyonce CDs. They disclosed locations of CIA blacksites, secret military bases, etc.
They caused a problem so large that the head of Homeland Security rebuked them on an open microphone.
A few years ago, Sony's PLAYSTATION network was breached and they leaked data on PAYING subscribers.
The latest breach shows that Sony LEARNED NOTHING.
1) They kept critical passwords in files named PASSWORD.xls. That is just plain STUPID.
2) They kept sensitive healthcare and financial data on employees in the same network as operational data. That's the same as putting your kitchen, living room, bathroom and bedroom in 1 room. YUCK!
They should have isolated their networks, files, databases and safe guarded them.
3) Sony under-invested (neglected?) their IT and cybersecurity practices
4) In the 70's SHELL invented the concept of the CHIEF RISK OFFICER - and every real company needs a CRO who is paid to look at risks to an organization, conduct blue sky threat analysis, and develop plans accordingly.
I don't see any evidence that SONY or SPE had a CRO.
5) Their cybersecurity practices were outdated and old-fashioned.
6) They did NOT have a plan to WHEN they would be breached.
The question for YOU , dear reader, is
A) Have you done your risk analysis?
B) Have you inventoried your passwords, information, data sets?
C) Do you have a PLAN for a breach?
D) DO you have DISASTER RECOVERY and BUSINESS CONTINUITY plans for your business? For your family?
E) What did you learn from SANDY? 9/11? Snowstorms 2 winters ago?
Are you applying those lessons in real life?
ADDENDUM: Sony & Hollywood are INVITING future trouble with their misguided wars with consumers and technology firms.
See http://www.theverge.com/2014/12/16/7401769/the-mpaa-wants-to-strike-at-dns-records-piracy-sopa-leaked-documents or google for
"sony dns hack"
"sony rootkit"
As long as SONY, WB, others keep harming their paying customers in a misguided attempt to maintain the copyright monopoly, they will be targets of even greater attacks.
I believe in copyrights and the rule of law. I also believe that manufacturers don't have unilateral rights to tell me what I can do with a gadget, widget, program or movie once I buy it. The desire to embed DRM everywhere, region-lock DVDs, pass DMCA, fight the WALKMAN, Home VCRs, TIVO and every other advancement in consumer technology is going to bite these guys....as it should.
NULL
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/reaction-to-the-sony-hack-is-beyond-the-realm-of-stupid
Sony is using this incidentto cry wolf, wrap itself in "we're victims of cyber terrorism" flag when all that happened is that Sony got embarassed.
The people Sony should worry about are employees and investors. They have lawyers :-D
NULL
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/sony-pictures-no-release-plans-the-interview-20141218?utm_source=newsletter&utm_content=daily&utm_campaign=121814_16&utm_medium=email&ea=YmVhcmFrQG1lLmNvbQ==
nice comments Raj!
NULL
NULL
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/world/fbi-accuses-north-korean-government-in-cyberattack-on-sony-pictures.html?emc=edit_na_20141219&nlid=4405288&_r=0
NULL
The fact that the FBI is blaming North Korea so quickly sounds suspicous. Reminds me of Colin Powell holding up YELLOW CAKE.
I think politicians and media are adjusting facts to fit their data.
Either the NK hackers are so sophisticated that they carried this off successfully for months OR they are incompetent idiots who left hard coded IP addresses in the code.
So, genius hackers or incompetent boobs? Can't have it both ways.
My suspicion is that the hard coded IPs is a false flag manuever, similar to the GULF OF TOMPKINS incident.
None of the experts I have spoken to, follow or read analysis from believe NK would leave hard coded IP addesses so blatantly in the hack.
ALSO, the initial message to SONY demanded a RANSOM. Only after the media got involved did THE INTERVIEW cancellation come up.
Governments do NOT ask for ransom. They penetrate, exfiltrate, destroy.
CRIMINALS ask for ransom.
NULL
Add new comment