Tuesday's vote

Categories
Politics

Happy November 1st! Just to remind you we have an obligation to vote next week.

As you consider who you're going to vote for this Tuesday, consider this:

 

  • Studies have shown that more attractive politicians get greater press coverage and more air time
  • Voters see more rotund male candidates as more trustworthy and even more inspiring than their thinner competition.
  • We tend to favor men with specific facial characteristics, which basically boils down to voting for more distinguished-looking gentlemen as opposed to "baby-faced" candidates.
  • According to a a study at MIT this phenomenon isn't limited by where you vote. People in different countries continually find certain candidates more trustworthy and electable based on their looks, no matter how different their cultures. And as long as those politicians are guys, it is the chubby yet distinguished-looking ones every time.
  • Studies have shown that if your local polling place is a school, you will vote yes for more school initiatives on the ballot, especially if there are teachers or students nearby.
  • A recent study found that churches -- which are the most common polling locations in America -- can make you turn in a ballot that is more conservative than your actual beliefs.
  • The outcome of college football games can determine how we vote in the elections that actually matter. It does make the people of that state less likely to fire someone, or in electoral politics, to vote against an incumbent running for re-election.

 

Just some thoughts as we start to think who to vote for.

Comments

Fred Klein

Is this a not so subtle campaign promo for that fat, insensitive New Jersey loud mouth?
Corey Bearak

Looks matter less than party affiliation. Only in high profiles races do voters look more closely at candidates particularly doe ticket. There endorsements, identity, record and positions matter. I tend to know more about candidates and who they respond to better: some may prove strong in caring for their constituents but lack experience (this could mean staffing) to make the difference. Some votes -- state legislature in NY - really remain more about which conference leader you wish to empower. The key thing is vote. The Electeds respond to communities that vote in greater numbers. Most know which communities they are.
Rona Gura

This brings me back to the Kennedy/Nixon debates where Kennedy's looks contributed to his "win."

Submitted by NULL (not verified) on Sat, 11/01/2014 - 21:00

Permalink

If this were the case I think Mitt would have sent further.
You guys don't like Chris Christie? He's a no nonsense kinda guy that says what he's thinking...not your typical politician. BTW he's thinning out since he had lap band surgery. If that "tollgate or bridge" issue deferred his career....that's pretty sad..usually the press or political parties dig up much bigger dirt. Perhaps there was not much else.
We also know this theory of good looking is abundantly clear in every part of life. Sad but true.

Submitted by Lucas_Meyer on Mon, 11/03/2014 - 01:29

Permalink
Lucas Meyer

In the immortal words of the late, great Johnny Carson, "I didn't know that."

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.