A test
Here is a test for everyone. The condemnation of the federal government right now is pretty universal throughout the country. Nitwits, tools, terrorists, arsonists, cowards, bullies are only the types of names that are fit for print here in our family-friendly blog. There are much worse being distributed in other venues.
I want to pose a test for everyone though who are embarrassed and angry about the incompetence shown by our governmental leaders.
Most of you have political inclinations and ideologies, and in particular opinions on Obamacare. Trying to respect Gotham's "no partisan politics rule" (so difficult in times of such partisan animosity), how many of you out there would be willing to end the government shutdown if it meant your position losing on Obamacare?

Comments
NULL
You don't change a law by threatening to shut down the government. It is a bad way to govern and it is bad precedent. So I think your question leads us down the wrong path.
NULL
The purpose of the blog was to show people that the political gridlock we see in government is not just rooted in stupidity, but in the challenged concept of compromise. I hear a lot of people talking about getting things done, but I see very few people truly understanding the concept of compromise and the emotional challenges that come with it...and they don't even have to answer to their constituents.
NULL
NULL
Unfortunately, many really stupid people hold public office. Some may be book smart; some may speak well; some may sound like they know what they are speaking about; they just do not understand economics, public policy and the public good. This comment seeks not to defend certain political views but extreme views coupled with ignorance and/or opportunism/ self-interest deserves punishment at the polls." I also identify and associate myself with the comments above by HHDB and tribal (co-)leader.
To suggest the law is unpopular ignores the massive website crunch of people trying to signup on Monday. The law may not be the best, but suggestions of bad makes no sense. It is better than what was; much better. Frankly to the extent mostly laws exist with imperfections, one might argue they are bad; of course that argument would be intellectual nonsense. To go further we need to visit the politics listserve where I remain encumbered by the fact that I get paid to message and respond; just because I can message effectively does not require me to step forward and point by point defend because I can do it "differently" when it remains the job of others.
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
That being said, I don't think that it is worth serious economic damage to the country which could result if this goes on to long or the debt ceiling is not appropriately managed.
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
Add new comment