A Royal Question
With all of the attention on the other side of the Pond over the birth of George Alexander Louis, aka His Royal Highness Prince George of Cambridge, the new heir to the British throne, I wonder what it would be like to live in a monarchy. My speculation only extends to consideration of a parliamentary monarchy -- where the monarch serves as a figure-head with traditional and historical functions (after all, we can’t ignore the War of Independence). Royalty above politics.
I understand that there is debate in England over whether to continue the monarchy. Which side would I be on?
What would it be like to be a "Subject" and have a King or Queen?

Comments
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
What I find fascinating is that the English constitution isn't a document as ours is. Rather, it is derived from English Common Law, precedents and tradition. In addition, the Prime Minister is simply the head of the party which has a majority of votes in the House of Commons-- separation of powers between the legislature and the executive therefore doesn't exist.
So the systems are quite different from each other. But somehow despite the fact that we take different roads, we seem to get to the same place more or less.
NULL
NULL
Add new comment