Did You Ever Notice?

Categories
Lifestyle

 

People in old photos are never smiling. Just think of those generational black and white and fading photos. Well dressed, carefully groomed very formal looking folks – but not a smile in the bunch.


I have very distinct memories of an old photo that my grandmother had on her dresser of her mother. Given that my grandmother was born in the very late 1800s, that photo was likely earlier than that. There was not even the hint of a smile on her face, or even in her eyes. The photo set such a serious tone.


Anyone know why the seriousness – and when it changed?

Comments

Fred Klein

When they started to say "Smile for the camera" or "Say cheese" :)
Fred Klein

Jo says with the advent of good dentistry :)
Scott Bloom

When it became Instant to take the picture, so you could smile briefly as opposed to having to Hold a pose for so long.
Shelley Simpson

Perhaps although it's a painting and not a photo, that's why the Mona Lisa is so special ...at least she was smiling. Seriously, I suppose it was because the purpose was to capture their likeness and not as an indication that they were having fun.

Submitted by Arlene_Haims on Tue, 07/06/2021 - 05:31

Permalink
Arlene Haims

So funny that you mentioned it. I have a family picture of my mother's family and no one was smiling. They were all dressed up (for then) but no one smiled.

Maybe the photographer never told them to.

Carol Greenwald

I think because to have your photo taken was a very expensive once in a lifetime event so you had to look serious.
Mitch Tobol

Experts say that the deeper reason for the lack of smiles early on is that photography took guidance from pre-existing customs in painting—an art form in which many found grins uncouth and inappropriate for portraiture.
Paula Oleska

My theory is that being serious meant that you were serious. Smiling abd laughing was was children and lower classes
Carly Bentley

I agree with Mitch. My son doesn’t smile in pictures. He says people look crazy when they smile. He thinks serious pictures are more handsome.
Daniel Schwartz

Scott hit it on the head, long exposure times back then meant you had to sit still in one position. Otherwise the picture would come out blurry. George Eastman of Kodak introduced the first flexible roll in the 1880's. It was the first camera that you sent back to the factory to be developed, like disposable camera today. No plates, quicker exposure times as well.
Flo Feinberg

So here goes….from Time magazine, Nov.28, 2016….
One possibility is dental; bad teeth caused tight lipped expressions, except that most people in the early 1800’s had bad, if any, teeth.
Another reason is because it took so long to capture a photograph it was too hard to hold a smile long enough; by the 1850’s it was possible in the right conditions to take a photo in a much shorter time, so more smiles appeared.
Photography followed customs in painting in which many found grins uncouth and inappropriate for portraiture.
A smile, or grimace, was often found in context….where 2 people might be playing poker the winner could be pictured smiling while the loser….not!
Although saints were depicted with faint smiles, wider smiles were “associated with madness, lewdness, loudness, drunkenness and all sorts of states less than decorous! What probably changed all that most was the rise of snapshot photography, which helped to democratize the art form.






Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.