It's Tough To Find Good Spies Nowadays
A story today indicated that the NSA has surveillance over 100,000 computers world wide including some that aren't even connected to the internet.
This comes on the heels of the Edward Snowden situation where Snowden (whistleblower or traitor?) revealed NSA secrets wreaking havoc on our geopolitical and diplomatic relationships. Other whislteblowers have generated various levels of fame/infamy with revelations.
Normally one would think that the more the people know the better, but we have government agencies who thrive and prosper in their objectives based upon secrecy. It's easy to fear the dangers of spying, secrecy and meddling in world affairs, but do we every truly think about the benefits? Would we have survived and won the cold war without our clandestine operations? If you don't believe in our covert operations as a nation, is there a price that you wouldn't pay for exposure? You have to think that most of the spying we do/have done are technically illegal. If you think we are wrong for doing this, is it unconditional. If we could have prevented WWII, the holocaust and the 52 million people that died, would that justify our "meddling?"

Comments
NULL
NULL
As Americans we tend to think we can, and should, have it all. We seldom face the reality that the freedom we enjoy comes with a very large price tag. Many thousands of very brave men and women sacrifice the comforts that we enjoy so that we may enjoy them. Some of them pay the ultimate price to maintain our freedom. The agencies within the Intelligence Community work very hard in support of these brave people, and perform many covert operations that continue to ensure our freedom. Very few of us ever get the opportunity to see this first hand, and are therefore quite skeptical of these actions. Having had that opportunity, I will gladly give up a small piece of my privacy to ensure the freedom of our country. I do wish that there was a better way to go about it, but I do not want to give up my freedom.
NULL
As to the question of the legality of what the intelligence services do and what does the public have the right to know. And when someone tells the public, when are they a whistle-blower or a traitor. There is no real easy answer. Some people believe the public has the right to know everything. But that is impractical and foolish. We all have our secrets or private discussions that we don't want made public. Nor does the public have the right to know everything. How shocked are you about the amount of private information on various movie stars or public figures is being sold and published. How would you like it if they did the same to you.
On a national level we need to gather intelligence in order to make decisions. Hopefully good ones. In order to gather this information we need to use many methods, including physical and electronic spying. How we do it will always cause a conflict with individual rights. This is a constant balancing act.
As a final aside. Did you notice how quickly the uproar on the spying on foreign leaders phones died down. Probably because their intelligence services told them they were doing the same thing to us.
NULL
NULL
NULL
Add new comment